EU AI Act Compliance: 12-Month Roadmap Through December 2027
TL;DR
- Three phases: NOW (AI Literacy + Prohibitions) — 08/2026 (Transparency + FRIA + Annex III legally binding) — 12/2027 (only if the Digital Omnibus proposal is adopted)
- Digital Omnibus proposal of 19 November 2025 [VOLATILE]: the trilogue is ongoing; postponement of Annex III to 02 December 2027 has NOT yet been adopted — until adoption, 02 August 2026 remains legally binding
- 90 % of SMEs are pure deployers — no provider obligations
- AI system inventory is the starting point — per system: risk class, role, obligations
- Fines up to EUR 35 million / 7 % of turnover for prohibited practices (Article 5)
1. Status of the EU AI Act 05/2026 + Digital Omnibus Proposal
The AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) has been in force since 01 August 2024. Application is phased. The European Commission presented the Digital Omnibus proposal on 19 November 2025 — as of 02 May 2026 the trilogue is ongoing and a postponement of the high-risk deadlines has NOT been adopted. The following applies:
| Obligation | Date of application |
|---|---|
| Article 4 (AI Literacy) | 02 February 2025 — already in force |
| Article 5 (Prohibited practices) | 02 February 2025 — already in force |
| GPAI (Articles 53–55) | 02 August 2025 — already in force |
| Article 50 (Transparency, watermarking) | 02 August 2026 — unchanged |
| Article 27 FRIA (credit scoring + public bodies) | 02 August 2026 — unchanged |
| Annex III High-Risk AI | 02 August 2026 legally binding (DO proposal: 02 December 2027 — not adopted) |
| Annex I (regulated products) | 02 August 2027 (DO proposal: 02 August 2028 — not adopted) |
2. Phase 1 (NOW): AI Literacy + Prohibitions
In force since 02 February 2025 — no transition period remaining.
- Article 4 AI Literacy: training for all persons who come into contact with AI. Content: AI definition, risk classes, prohibited practices, transparency obligations, human oversight. With quiz and certificate.
- Article 5 Prohibitions: 8 main categories — manipulation, exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, real-time biometrics in public spaces, predictive policing, image databases through untargeted scraping, emotion recognition in the workplace, biometric categorisation. Fines up to EUR 35 million / 7 %.
3. Phase 2 (08/2026): Transparency + FRIA
Short answer: from 02 August 2026, two central obligations apply: Article 50 requires machine-readable labelling of AI-generated audio, video, image and text content, explicit deepfake disclosure as well as AI notices for chatbots. Article 27 requires a FRIA for public bodies and private actors with public tasks — in particular credit scoring (Annex III No. 5b) and life/health insurance scoring (No. 5c).
From 02 August 2026:
- Article 50 Transparency: AI-generated audio/video/image/text must be identifiable as AI-generated (machine-readable). Deepfakes: explicitly disclosed. Chatbots: AI notice.
- Article 27 FRIA: for public bodies + private actors with public tasks (credit scoring under Annex III No. 5b, life/health insurance scoring under 5c). Content: description of AI use, affected persons, risks to fundamental rights, safeguards.
4. Phase 3 (High-Risk AI Annex III from 02 August 2026)
From 02 August 2026 (legally binding; Digital Omnibus proposal of 19 November 2025: postponement to 02 December 2027 — trilogue ongoing, not yet adopted):
- Risk management system (Article 9)
- Data governance concept (Article 10)
- Technical documentation Annex IV (Article 11)
- Logging concept (Article 12)
- Transparency towards deployers (Article 13)
- Human oversight (Article 14)
- Accuracy / robustness / cybersecurity (Article 15)
- QMS manual (Article 17, providers only)
- Conformity assessment (Article 43)
- EU database registration (Article 49)
- Post-market monitoring (Article 72)
- Incident response (Article 73)
5. AI System Inventory — the Starting Point
Short answer: every EU AI Act compliance effort starts with an AI system inventory. Per system, six fields must be captured: name and provider, use case, role (provider/deployer/both), risk class (prohibited under Article 5 / high-risk under Annex III / GPAI / minimal), data categories processed including special categories, as well as those responsible for oversight and escalation.
Document the following per AI system:
- Name + provider: ChatGPT/Microsoft Copilot/in-house solution
- Use case: marketing copy, HR screening, code generation
- Role: provider / deployer / both
- Risk class: prohibited (Article 5) / high-risk (Annex III) / GPAI / minimal
- Data categories: which personal data / special categories?
- Oversight: who monitors? Which escalation path?
6. Provider vs. Deployer
Short answer: providers develop or place an AI system on the market and bear the principal obligations (conformity assessment, technical documentation Annex IV, EU database registration, risk management); around 10 % of SMEs are providers. Deployers use an AI system under their own responsibility (~90 % of SMEs) and must ensure intended use, review input data relevance, retain logs and, where applicable, carry out a FRIA. In the event of a substantial modification (Article 25), the deployer transitions into the provider role.
| Provider | Deployer | |
|---|---|---|
| Who? | Anyone who develops or places an AI system on the market | Anyone who uses an AI system under their own responsibility |
| SME share | ~10 % | ~90 % |
| Principal obligations | Conformity assessment, technical documentation, EU database registration, risk management | Intended use, input data relevance review, log retention, FRIA where applicable |
| Transition to provider | — | Upon substantial modification (Article 25) |
7. 12-Month Action Plan
Short answer: the 12-month plan starts with the AI inventory, Article 5 screening and AI Literacy training (months 1-2), followed by an Acceptable Use Policy (M3), GPAI compliance review (M4-5), Article 50 transparency workflow (M6), FRIA for credit scoring/public tasks (M7), risk management system under Article 9 if you are a provider (M8-9), technical documentation Annex IV (M10-11) and audit simulation plus managing director briefing on 12/2027 readiness (M12).
| Month | Action |
|---|---|
| Month 1-2 | AI system inventory + Article 5 screening + AI Literacy training |
| Month 3 | Acceptable Use Policy for AI, provider/deployer clarification per system |
| Month 4-5 | Review GPAI inventory + Code of Practice compliance |
| Month 6 | Article 50 transparency workflow (watermarking, chatbot notices) |
| Month 7 | FRIA for relevant use cases (credit scoring, public tasks) |
| Month 8-9 | Risk management system (Article 9) if provider |
| Month 10-11 | Prepare technical documentation Annex IV |
| Month 12 | Audit simulation, managing director briefing on 12/2027 readiness |
8. Budget & Effort
Short answer: effort scales with role: pure deployers in the SME segment are at around 0.2 FTE over 4 months (EUR 5,000-20,000 plus training), high-risk deployers at 0.5 FTE × 6 months (additional EUR 15,000-40,000), high-risk providers at 1 FTE × 12 months including conformity assessment (EUR 50,000-200,000) and GPAI providers at 2-5 FTE × 12 months (EUR 250,000-1,000,000).
| Role | Initial effort (FTE) | Cost estimate |
|---|---|---|
| Pure deployer (SME) | 0.2 FTE × 4 months | EUR 5,000-20,000 + training |
| High-risk deployer | 0.5 FTE × 6 months | +EUR 15,000-40,000 |
| High-risk provider | 1 FTE × 12 months + conformity assessment | EUR 50,000-200,000 |
| GPAI provider | 2-5 FTE × 12 months | EUR 250,000-1,000,000 |
Sources
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Regulation) — EUR-Lex DE full text (as of: 02 May 2026)
- AI Act Article 99 — fine tiers 35M/15M/7.5M (Service Desk) (as of: 02 May 2026)
- AI Act Article 27 — FRIA obligation (applies from 02 August 2026)
- AI Act Article 51 — GPAI threshold 10²⁵ FLOPs
- European Commission — Digital Omnibus proposal (as of: 02 May 2026, trilogue ongoing)
- GPAI Code of Practice (Commission) (as of: 02 May 2026)
Frequently Asked Questions
What do I need to do NOW (as of 04/2026)?
Which obligations would be postponed by the Digital Omnibus?
When must a FRIA be carried out?
Provider or deployer - which one am I?
Substantial Modification - when do I become a provider?
Is ISO 42001 sufficient as evidence of AI Act compliance?
What does AI Act compliance cost?
Fines - how high?
Sources
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — EU AI Act (Art. 4, 5, 26, 27, 53-55) (As of: 2026-05-02)
- EU AI Act Art. 27 — FRIA (As of: 2026-05-02)
- Commission Digital Omnibus (proposal, 19 Nov 2025) — trilogue ongoing (As of: 2026-05-02)