EU Pay Transparency 2026: Obligations, Thresholds, Templates
TL;DR
- Deadline 07 June 2026 — all EU Member States must transpose Directive 2023/970 by this date; German implementation is delayed
- Three thresholds 100/150/250 determine reporting obligations (frequency, level of detail, joint pay assessment)
- Obligation for ALL employers: salary range in job postings, ban on salary history questions, right to information — regardless of size
- Reversal of burden of proof (Art. 18) — stricter than Section 22 AGG, makes documentation of remuneration criteria a mandatory task
- Joint pay assessment from 5% pay gap between comparable activities — together with employee representation
1. What is the EU Pay Transparency Directive?
The EU Pay Transparency Directive (Directive (EU) 2023/970) is the largest reform of European pay equality law since the Equal Treatment Directive 2006/54/EC. It aims to reduce the gender pay gap by imposing reporting, information, and corrective obligations on employers.
Adopted on 10 May 2023, OJ L 132/21 of 17 May 2023. Member States have until 07 June 2026 to transpose the directive into national law.
"Member States shall ensure that all employers apply objective, gender-neutral criteria for remuneration and career development." — Art. 4(2) Directive 2023/970
2. Who is affected? The 100/150/250 matrix
Reporting obligations scale with employee headcount. Three thresholds determine the frequency and level of detail required for reporting:
| Employees | First reporting obligation | Subsequent frequency | Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 250+ | 07 June 2027 | annually | Full report including median comparison, quartile distribution, joint pay assessment from 5% gap |
| 150–249 | 07 June 2027 | every 3 years | Full report (same as 250+) |
| 100–149 | 07 June 2031 | every 3 years | Full report |
| < 100 | — | no obligation | however: job posting requirement and right to information apply! |
Key obligations independent of the threshold (for all employers, including those with <100 employees):
- Salary range or entry-level salary in job postings or prior to the interview (Art. 5)
- Ban on asking applicants about previous salary (Art. 7(5))
- Employees' right to information regarding their own salary + average salary of comparable activities (Art. 7)
- Gender-neutral job evaluation (Art. 4)
3. Right to information: what employees can request
Art. 7 Directive 2023/970 grants employees a new, individual right to information. They may request from the employer in text form:
- Their own salary
- The gender-specific average of employees performing the same or equivalent activity
- The criteria for salary determination, salary progression, and promotion
The employer must respond within 2 months. Refusal is only permitted if the request is manifestly abusive — the burden of proof rests with the employer.
4. Mandatory information in job postings from 07 June 2026
Art. 5 obliges employers to provide the following information in every job posting or before the first interview:
- Entry-level salary or salary range (based on objective, gender-neutral criteria)
- Where applicable: relevant collective bargaining provisions
- Gender-neutral job title and posting language
In practice: Including the information in the posting itself is the simplest compliance option (audit-proof, less potential for dispute). Those who rely on "before the interview" must document the delivery.
5. Pay report: content & frequency
The report under Art. 9 is significantly more detailed than the previous report pursuant to Section 21 EntgTranspG. Mandatory information (for 250+):
- Gender-specific pay gap (entire company)
- Pay gap based on variable remuneration (bonuses, commissions)
- Median pay gap (instead of arithmetic mean as previously)
- Share of female/male employees per salary quartile
- Pay gap per activity group ("groups of employees performing the same or equivalent activity")
The report is submitted to the competent national authority. The authority publishes aggregated data — the individual data is not public.
6. Joint pay assessment from 5% pay gap
If the pay gap of an employee group exceeds 5% AND cannot be explained by objective gender-neutral criteria AND has not been corrected within 6 months, a joint pay assessment is triggered (Art. 10).
The assessment is a joint evaluation with employee representation. Content: analysis of the causes of the gap, action plan, implementation tracking. The outcome is made public within the company.
7. GDPR interface
The EDPB clarified in Guidelines 03/2024: publication of individually identifiable salary data is to be measured against Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR (legal obligation). Reports with fewer than 4 persons per comparison group must be aggregated or suppressed — otherwise the re-identification risk applies (Art. 9 sensitivity of gender-related data).
8. Fines & reversal of burden of proof
Art. 23 requires "effective, proportionate and dissuasive" sanctions. Comparative countries:
- Belgium: up to EUR 187,500 per infringement
- Spain: up to EUR 225,000
- France: 1% of the total wage bill for repeated infringement
More important than the fine: Art. 18 Directive 2023/970 provides for a reversal of the burden of proof. If employees present indications (e.g. salary differences + identical activity), the employer must provide counter-evidence. The Federal Labor Court (BAG) ruling 8 AZR 488/19 (21 January 2021) already recognized the reversal of burden of proof under Section 22 AGG; BAG 8 AZR 300/24 (23 October 2025) additionally clarified in 2025 that a pairwise comparison with a single male colleague is sufficient for the presumption of discrimination — the EU directive tightens this further.
9. Status of transposition in Germany/Austria/Switzerland
Short answer: As of April 2026, the German transposition of the EntgTranspG is delayed (BMAS draft bill announced for Q3 2026) — however, the EU directive applies directly from 07 June 2026 via primacy of application. Austria is planning the EntgleichV with anticipated application date of 01 July 2026; Sweden has announced it will miss the deadline. Switzerland is not directly affected but retains the Logib audit obligation from 100 employees.
| Country | Status (April 2026) | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | Reform of the EntgTranspG delayed. BMAS draft bill announced for Q3 2026. | EU directive applies directly via primacy of application from 07 June 2026 — even without national law |
| Austria | Consultation draft 03/2026 — transposition in the "EntgleichV" | Application date anticipated 01 July 2026 |
| Sweden | Delay announced 03/2026 | EU deadline miss accepted |
| Switzerland | Not directly applicable (not an EU member) | Logib audit obligation from 100 employees remains unchanged |
10. 8-step checklist by 07 June 2026
Short answer: Pay transparency compliance in eight steps: clarify threshold, establish gender-neutral job evaluation, expand job posting workflow to include salary ranges, set up an information process with a 2-month SLA, collect pay gap baseline (median per activity group), develop reporting template, establish joint pay assessment process with the works council, and brief the Data Protection Officer (DPO) for GDPR-compliant reporting.
- Clarify threshold — employee headcount, definition of employees (part-time ratio, temporary workers), subsidiary companies
- Create job evaluation — gender-neutral criteria, define "same/equivalent activity" clusters
- Adapt job posting workflow — salary range as a mandatory field in the HR system, update templates
- Establish information process — application form, response template, 2-month response SLA
- Pay gap baseline analysis — median comparison per activity group + quartile distribution as the 2025 baseline
- Develop reporting template — await the format of the national authority and prepare accordingly
- Joint pay assessment process with the works council — threshold 5%, 6-month correction period
- DPO briefing — GDPR-compliant reporting, aggregation thresholds, re-identification risk
Sources
- Directive (EU) 2023/970 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023, OJ L 132/21 of 17 May 2023
- Pay Transparency Act (EntgTranspG), BGBl. 2017 I p. 2152
- Federal Labor Court (BAG), ruling of 16 February 2023 — 8 AZR 450/21 ("better negotiating skill" does not justify a pay difference), bundesarbeitsgericht.de
- Federal Labor Court (BAG), ruling of 21 January 2021 — 8 AZR 488/19 (median indication reversal of burden of proof Section 22 AGG / Section 3(2) sentence 1 EntgTranspG), bundesarbeitsgericht.de
- Federal Labor Court (BAG), ruling of 23 October 2025 — 8 AZR 300/24 (pairwise comparison sufficient; Daimler Truck), bundesarbeitsgericht.de
- EDPB, Guidelines 03/2024 on the GDPR interface with pay transparency
- BMBFSFJ Expert Commission "Low-Bureaucracy Implementation", final report 11/2025
- European Commission, Pay Transparency Q&A, 03/2026
Sources
- Directive (EU) 2023/970 — Pay Transparency (transposition deadline 07.06.2026) (As of: 2026-05-02)
- EntgTranspG — Pay Transparency Act (DE, current) (As of: 2026-05-02)
- General Equal Treatment Act (AGG) — Section 22 burden of proof (As of: 2026-05-02)
- BAG 8 AZR 300/24 — pair-wise comparison equal pay (As of: 2026-05-02)